Exercise of Authority of the Rights of the Public Prosecutor in Determining the Procedure for Examining Evidence in Court Proceedings

Abstract

The issues of determining the order of the study of evidence require scientific understanding and legislative improvement. The participation of a public prosecutor in determining the procedure for examining evidence implies the need to ensure the effective exercise of his rights. The purpose of this study is to resolve some theoretical and applied issues related to the participation of a public prosecutor in a judicial investigation. The setting of this goalpredetermined the need to solve such problems as the analysis of the concept of “order of examination evidence”, development of a procedure for determining the order of examination of evidence, identification of the specifics of the participation of the public prosecutor in determining the order of examination of evidence in a judicial investigation. When solving the set tasks, formal-logical, historical methodsof scientific research were used. Based on the results of the study, the author’s position was developed in relation to the definition of the concept of “the procedure for examining evidence”, as well as scientifically grounded proposals for improving the norms of the criminal procedure law governing the procedure for examining evidence in court proceedings.