Abstract

blood flow restriction (BFR) training could be a valuable treatment to induce exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, the use of BFR in these patients is poorly explored and there is no evidence about the training dosage needed. To evaluate the effect of resistance training protocols with different occlusion levels of blood flow restriction (BFR) on EIH in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Crossover study. University physical exercise laboratory. 26 adults with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Patients performed 4 sets (30, 15, 15 and 15 repetitions) separated by 1-minute rests of three protocols/sessions of low-load (30% 1RM) seated knee extensions with elastic bands and BFR: placebo (sham BFR), BFR at 40% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) and BFR at 80% AOP. Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) collected before, immediate post session and post 10 minutes. No differences in EIH between the different levels of BFR were found. However, 80% AOP protocol worsened VAS scores immediately (Mean difference, MD (95%CI): -21.190 (-33.897 to -8.484)) while improving PPT immediately (MD (95%CI); affected limb: -.629 (-1.080 to -.177); contralateral: -.590 (-.986 to -.195)) and at 10 min (MD (95%CI); affected limb: -.633 (-1.153 to -.113); contralateral: -.676 (-1.136 to -.216); and forearm: -.467 (-.881 to -.053)) post-exercise compared to baseline. There is no EIH difference after using different occlusion levels. EIH is modulated by pain-related psychological constructs and self-perceived health status.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call