Abstract

Employee stock options go underwater when stock prices decline. In the 1990s, firms responded by repricing underwater options, a practice in which underwater options are replaced by new at-the-money options. We examine the repricing of options from the perspective of the costs of repricing to firms and the value to employees. Using a hand-collected dataset, we find that the primary recipients of option repricings are lower ranked non-executive employees rather than executive officers. The costs of repricings to firms is rather modest relative to its value to risk-averse, undiversified employees. We also find that repricing results in a large change in the level of incentives, i.e. pay-performance sensitivity, from the perspective of the employees. The asymmetry between the lower costs to firms and the greater value to employees perhaps explains why repricing, and similar alternatives that deal with underwater options, remain popular even in the face of criticism from institutional investors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.