Abstract

Background and Aim: The ability to adapt gait when negotiating unexpected hazards is crucial to maintain stability and avoid falling. This study investigated cognitive, physical and psychological factors associated with gait adaptability required for obstacle and stepping target negotiation in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD).Methods: Fifty-four people with PD were instructed to either: (a) avoid an obstacle at usual step distance; or (b) step onto a target at either a short or long step distance projected on a walkway two heel strikes ahead and then continue walking. Participants also completed clinical [Hoehn & Yahr rating scale; Movement Disorders Society version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor section (MDS-UPDRS-III)], cognitive [simple reaction time, Trail Making and Stroop stepping (difference between incongruent and standard Choice Stepping Reaction Time, CSRT) tests], physical [hip abductor muscle power and reactive balance (pull test from the MDS-UPDRS-III)] and psychological (Fall Efficacy Scale–International) assessments.Results: Discriminant function analysis revealed Stroop stepping test (inhibitory control) performance was the best predictor of stepping errors across the Gait Adaptability Test (GAT) conditions. Poorer executive function [Trail Making Test (TMT)] and reactive balance predicted poorer stepping accuracy in the short target condition; poorer reactive balance predicted increased number of steps taken to approach the obstacle and the long target; and poorer executive function predicted obstacle avoidance. Weaker hip abductor muscle power, poorer reactive balance, slower reaction time, poorer executive function and higher concern about falling were significant predictors of shorter step length while negotiating the obstacle/targets.Conclusion: Superior executive function, effective reactive balance and good muscle power were associated with successful gait adaptability. Executive function and reactive balance appear particularly important for precise foot placements; and cognitive capacity for step length adjustments for avoiding obstacles. These findings suggest that impaired inhibitory control contributes to stepping errors and may increase fall risk in people with PD. These findings help elucidate mechanisms for why people with PD fall and may facilitate fall risk assessments and fall prevention strategies for this group.

Highlights

  • The incidence of falls in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is higher than in the healthy older population

  • Data presented are mean (SD) unless stated otherwise. aNumber of participants (%) who made at least one mistake in the gait adaptability test.bDistance between the center of the target and the center of the foot; high values mean worse performance. cNumber of steps taken to approach the target or obstacle. dStep that hit or avoided the stimulus was named “target/obstacle step” and the preceding step was named “previous step.”

  • We found reduced muscle power was associated with short step length in the baseline, walk-through and short target conditions; findings that build on previous work that has shown people with PD have shorter step lengths during usual (Sofuwa et al, 2005) and adaptive (Vitório et al, 2010) gait as well as reduced lower limb muscle strength and power than healthy controls (Allen et al, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of falls in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) is higher than in the healthy older population. Most falls occur when people with PD are walking (Mak and Pang, 2010) and when they are optimally medicated (Gray and Hildebrand, 2000; Bloem et al, 2001; Lamont et al, 2017). It is possible that declines in the ability to adapt gait behavior, under challenging environmental conditions contribute to trips; which are a frequently reported cause of falls in people with PD (Mak and Pang, 2010; Stack and Roberts, 2013; Gazibara et al, 2014). This study investigated cognitive, physical and psychological factors associated with gait adaptability required for obstacle and stepping target negotiation in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.