Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the significance and effectiveness of the execution of state administrative judicial decisions as a reflection of the authority of the court. It delves into understanding how the execution process mirrors the court's capacity to ensure compliance with its decisions within the state administrative framework. Theoretical Framework: Drawing upon legal theories of administrative law and judicial authority, this research situates itself within the context of the separation of powers doctrine and the judicial function in administrative matters. It also explores concepts of legal compliance, the role of courts in decision enforcement, and the impact of administrative judicial decisions on governance. Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing case studies and legal analysis to investigate the execution process of state administrative judicial decisions. It involves in-depth examination of court rulings, judicial proceedings, and administrative actions taken post-decision. Interviews with legal experts and stakeholders involved in execution processes supplement the analysis. Results and Conclusion: The findings showcase the pivotal role of the execution process in reflecting the authority and efficacy of the court within the state administrative system. The study unveils the challenges and successes in implementing administrative judicial decisions, highlighting areas of compliance and resistance. It concludes by discussing the implications of these results for the authority of the court in the administrative context. Originality/Value: This research contributes to the understanding of the correlation between the execution of state administrative judicial decisions and the authority of the court. It fills a gap in scholarly literature by offering insights into the practical manifestations of judicial authority in administrative matters, shedding light on the complexities, challenges, and opportunities inherent in ensuring compliance with administrative court rulings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call