Abstract
This article used some postmodern literary theories of philosophers such as Jean-Fran�ois Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida and Julia Kristeva to scrutinise a selection of texts from the post-exilic period with regard to the exclusive language employed in these texts. Lyotard�s insights relate to and complement Foucault�s concept of �counter-memory�. Foucault also focuses on the network of discursive powers that operate behind texts and reproduce them, arguing that it is important to have a look from behind so as to see which voices were silenced by the specific powers behind texts. The author briefly looked at different post-exilic texts within identity-finding contexts, focusing especially on Chronicles and a few Qumran texts, to examine the way in which they used language to create identity and to empower the community in their different contexts. It is generally accepted that both the author(s) of 1 & 2 Chronicles and the Qumran community used texts selectively, with their own nuances, omissions and additions. This study scrutinised the way the author(s) of Chronicles and the Qumran community used documents selectively, focusing on the way in which they used exclusive language. It is clear that all communities used such language in certain circumstances to strengthen a certain group�s identity, to empower them and to legitimise this group�s conduct, behaviour and claims � and thereby exclude other groups.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: Based on postmodern literary theories, this article compares the exclusive language used in Chronicles and in the texts of the Qumran community, pointing to the practice of creating identity and empowering through discourse. In conclusion, the article reflects on what is necessary in a South African context, post-1994, to be a truly democratic country.Keywords: Exclusive language; inclusive; Jean-Fran�ois Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu; Derrida; Qumran Chronicles
Highlights
Is South Africa truly a democratic1 country? Because an undemocratic country is characterised by habits of exclusive language, I decided to look at the way exclusive language is used in ancient religious texts
I refer to aspects of the postmodern literary theories of philosophers such as Jean-François Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida to examine the exclusive language in texts, in Chronicles and a number of Qumran texts
I contextualise the exclusive and inclusive language as it is appropriated in different communities and reflect on the question of whether South Africa is truly democratic after 21 years of democratic elections
Summary
I briefly look at different post-exilic texts within contexts that grapple with finding identity, focusing especially on Chronicles and a few Qumran texts, to examine the way in which they have used language to create identity and to empower the community in their different contexts. I examine the way the author(s) of Chronicles and the Qumran community used documents selectively by focusing on the way in which they used exclusive language in their distinctive contexts. I contextualise the exclusive and inclusive language as it is appropriated in different communities and reflect on the question of whether South Africa is truly democratic after 21 years of democratic elections.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
