Abstract

In this paper, we compare the predictions on the market liquidity in crypto and fiat currencies between two traditional time series methods, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and the machine learning algorithm called the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach. We measure market liquidity as the log rates of bid-ask spreads in a sample of three cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple) and 16 major fiat currencies from 9 February 2018 to 8 February 2019. We find that the KNN approach is better suited for capturing the market liquidity in a cryptocurrency in the short-term than the ARMA and GARCH models maybe due to the complexity of the microstructure of the market. Considering traditional time series models, we find that ARMA models perform well when estimating the liquidity of fiat currencies in developed markets, whereas GARCH models do the same for fiat currencies in emerging markets. Nevertheless, our results show that the KNN approach can better predict the log rates of the bid-ask spreads of crypto and fiat currencies than ARMA and GARCH models.

Highlights

  • The popularity of cryptocurrency with financial intermediaries came about as a consequence of the perceived failures of the monetary authorities in the global financial crisis of and the European sovereign debt crisis during 2010 to 2013 [1]

  • We find that the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach, which is a supervised machine learning algorithm, is better suited to predict the liquidity of the cryptocurrency market than a classical linear model such as the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model or a nonlinear model such as the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) that are intensively used to predict volatility

  • We compare the predictions on the short-term market liquidity of the major crypto and fiat currencies by using classical time-series models such as ARMA and GARCH and a nonparametric learning machine algorithm called the KNN approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The popularity of cryptocurrency with financial intermediaries came about as a consequence of the perceived failures of the monetary authorities in the global financial crisis of and the European sovereign debt crisis during 2010 to 2013 [1]. In terms of monetary attributes, Yermack [2] explains that Bitcoin does not behave to a fiat currency according to the criteria widely used by economists. Some economists view the inelasticity in the supply of cryptocurrency as an advantage but some view it as a disadvantage. Cryptocurrencies are digital coins not issued by any government or legal entity [3]; they only use cryptography and a clever system to regulate their supply, control trading operations and avoid frauds. Digital currencies are based on peer-to-peer authentication with rules to determine the amount and condition produced [5]. These currencies plan the peer-to-peer network as a set of nodes in a self-organizing connected network.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call