Abstract

It is often argued that the persistent amounts of excess reserves in the 1934–1941 period were sought either for protective liquidity or as a signal of bank safety to depositors. More recent explanations argue that these excess reserves were unintended inventory due to the high internal adjustment costs of converting reserves to income-producing assets. Our findings support the latter explanation and reveal high internal asset adjustment costs after 1933. Thus, a monetary policy focused on increasing reserves would have been ineffective. A successful monetary policy would be one that increased outside money.(JEL G210, G280, O420)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.