Examples of unsteady combustion in non-metallized propellants

Abstract

For over thirty years the T-Burner has been the de facto standard for determining the unstable response of solid propellants. This paper reviews some of the different approaches that have been used, and briefly summarizes advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques. Data from a variety of sources have been reviewed and summarized showing the effect of various test conditions and propellant formulation variations. Much of the data taken in the 60's and early 70's were with so-called research propellants, with relatively low solids loading and usually monomodal AP as the oxidizer. Later data were obtained with propellants containing solids loading more typical and practical propellants. Several distinct differences were observed in the data for the different types of propellants. Data varying AP particle size distributions indicate that either additional fine AP or finer AP usually increases the propellant response. A significant reduction in the response can be achieved by reducing the amount of fine AP, while holding burning rate constant either by adding a catalyst or by varying the overall AP size distribution. A significant amount of data has been obtained for reduced smoke propellants containing stability additives. The data indicate that the additives provide significant particle damping, and most often, also reduce the propellant response. Data from double base propellants indicate a much broader response over a wide frequency range. This implies that double base propellants should be more unstable in tangential modes than composite propellants. This trend seems to be consistent with observed motor data. Measuring the response of metallized propellants has been a challenge due to the large damping due to metal oxide particles in the gas. Data from metallized propellants are not presented here, but will be summarized in a future paper.