Abstract

It is well established that manipulations of low-level stimulus properties unrelated to mass can impact perception of heaviness, the most famous example being the size-weight illusion whereby small objects feel heavier than equally-weighted larger objects. Interestingly, manipulations of high-level cues such as material have also induced weight illusions, highlighting that cognitive expectations alone are enough to create illusory weight differences. Less is known, however, about what type of cognitive expectations can influence perception of heaviness. As labels are often used to signify the heaviness of objects, this study examined whether semantic cues could induce a novel weight illusion. Participants lifted equally-sized and equally-weighted sets of objects labelled as ‘light’ and ‘heavy’ and reported their perceived heaviness both prior to and after lifting. Fingertip forces were also measured to understand how semantic cues may influence sensorimotor prediction. The labels clearly affected pre-lift-off expectations of heaviness. By contrast, we found no effect of these labels on the perceived heaviness of objects, nor on the forces used to grip and lift them on early trials. In other words, we find no evidence that semantic cues affect perception or action enough to induce a novel weight illusion. These findings suggest that the explicit expectations created by the labels did not dominate the implicit expectations created by the equal sizes of the objects, highlighting the segregated nature of cognitive expectations and their variable influences on perception and action.

Highlights

  • Our experience of how heavy an object feels is notoriously fallible, as this percept is affected by a range of factors unrelated to its mass

  • To examine how semantic cues affect sensorimotor prediction, we analysed the fingertip forces applied during the initial lifts of the heavy pair of objects

  • The current study aimed to examine whether semantic cues may impact perceptions of heaviness and sensorimotor prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our experience of how heavy an object feels is notoriously fallible, as this percept is affected by a range of factors unrelated to its mass. In the size-weight illusion small objects feel up to 50% heavier than larger objects with the same mass (Charpentier, 1891; Nicolas et al, 2012) The mechanism underpinning this effect, and its utility, are still far from certain (Ernst, 2009; Zhu and Bingham, 2011; Buckingham, 2014; Dijker, 2014), but one popular explanation suggests that the illusory weight differences which characterize the SWI reflect the way in which expectations (priors) are integrated with sensory input in this particular context. More recent, variants of this explanation suggest that expected density is the variable integrated with sensory inputs related to object mass to yield the experience of an object’s heaviness (Peters et al, 2016). Consistent across both of these explanations, is that cognitive factors are modulating the input of the sensory organs to modulate hedonic experience of an object’s heaviness

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call