Abstract

Value is a worth given to something either for its consequential utility for the valuers or a worth given for its own sake. While the former way of evaluation is called extrinsic value, the latter is called intrinsic value. Any kind of approach we adapt to anything emerges from a kind of value we allocate to the thing in question, i.e., kind of value people attribute to the natural environment in general and to non-human, in particular, determine people's treatment, evaluation, action and attitude toward the being in focus. Supposing that the ever-increasing environmental crisis is anthropogenic, this paper is trying to examine the kind of value allocated to the environment and non-human beings in East Gojjam. A qualitative approach and case study design were employed to achieve the objective. Both Primary and secondary dated dates were collected. To collect data, focus group discussion, semi-structured interview, key informant interview, and document review were employed as data collecting instruments. Hence, the participants: officials and exports from the office of wildlife protection, office of natural resource management as well as the office of forest enterprise, local people and religious leaders were purposively selected, and the sample size was determined by data saturation. Finally, the collected data was analyzed thematically. The research found out that the kind of value ascribed to environments is extrinsic. Treating animals and plants as the mere means for the manifold end of human being paves the way for human beings to have untrammeled intervention in the environment.

Highlights

  • Value is a worth given to something either for its consequential utility for the valuers or a worth given for its own sake

  • The findings show that the dominant understanding of the environment in the study area is human-centred that prioritizes the interest of current human beings and the posterity to the wellbeing or natural balance of the environment

  • That means the caution both government offices and human beings extended to natural environments is like that of care given to instruments or tools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Value is a worth given to something either for its consequential utility for the valuers or a worth given for its own sake. Human beings have believed that nature and its parts are created to satisfy the dynamic of their desire This anthropocentric (human-centred) view of the environment has theological and philosophical justification. Examining the Values Allocated to the Natural Environment: Non-human beings in focus. Immanuel Kant and Rene Descartes, well-known philosophers in modern philosophy, argue that assigning intrinsic value to non-human beings is nugatory. While the former denies non-human beings a moral treatment for their own sake (1997:35), the latter takes them as machines as if they don't have their own will, choices and good (1998:181). These two philosophers allocate instrumental value for non-human beings

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call