Examining The Right To Die In The Context Of Euthanasia: A Critical Analysis

Abstract

The right to life is a fundamental entitlement, safeguarded by both Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and Article 3 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Every facet of the right to life is subject to judicial scrutiny and contingent upon specific circumstances. Within this realm lies the contentious right to die, often associated with the concept of euthanasia or "mercy killing." Advocates argue that individuals, under certain circumstances, should have the option to choose death rather than being compelled to endure continued existence. Divergent viewpoints on this issue either oppose the legalization of euthanasia or dispute the recognition of the right to die based on particular grounds. Within the boundaries of a dignified life, individuals have the right to confront challenging conditions without succumbing to despair. Such principles are ingrained in Indian culture, with Hinduism emphasizing the eternal nature of the soul and the transformative nature of death for the body. Conversely, the Muslim faith asserts that life should only conclude at Allah's will, supporting a stance aligned with natural death. In contemporary society, there is a growing argument that individuals should be granted the option to choose death under specific circumstances. Consequently, it is imperative for the government and the Parliament to establish pertinent laws and regulations to prevent potential abuses in such situations