Abstract

The Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ) was revised to its third iteration (BREQ-3) and has been widely used to measure different types of exercise motivation, including amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation. However, the Chinese version has not been similarly revised. The aim of this study was to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese BREQ-3 using alternative structural equation models. Specifically, this study aimed to translate the English BREQ-3 into Chinese to examine the best representation of the factor configuration of Chinese BREQ-3, measurement invariance for the best-fitted model, and the concurrent validity evidence and reliability for the Chinese BREQ-3. Undergraduate students (N = 825) from mainland China completed a battery of online questionnaires. After including two general motivation factors (controlled motivation and autonomous motivation), we discovered that the majority of items on the identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation subscales no longer loaded on or had very low loadings on their specific factors, implying that these items essentially represent a unidimensional construct. Invariance testing supported the comparison between latent factor means across gender based on the bi-factor exploratory structural equation model (BESEM). Concurrent validity evidence was found for amotivation, controlled motivation, and autonomous motivation. The hierarchical omega, explained common variance (ECV), item explained common variance (I_ECV), and percentage of uncontaminated correlations (PUC) indicated that the external regulation and introjected regulation subscales had a multidimensional structure, while the identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation subscales had a unidimensional structure (autonomous motivation). We advocate calculating amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, and a single autonomous motivation (excluding item 19) score when utilizing the Chinese BREQ-3.

Highlights

  • The current conceptualization and assessment of motivation is informed by self-determination theory (SDT), which posits human behaviors to achieve particular goals can be explained by different types of motivation, including amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation [1]

  • In light of the aforementioned limitations, this study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ)-3

  • While all the items loaded on the corresponding controlled motivation and autonomous motivation factors, the items on the external motivation and introjected regulation subscales kept loading on their specific factors, but the items from the identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation subscales no longer loaded onto or experienced a substantial drop in factor loadings on their specific factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current conceptualization and assessment of motivation is informed by self-determination theory (SDT), which posits human behaviors to achieve particular goals can be explained by different types of motivation, including amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation [1]. Grounded in SDT, the Perceived Locus of Causality Questionnaire [10], Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ [11]), and Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire [12] have been developed, updated into more comprehensive versions over the years, and translated to other languages to expand use. The adoption of those instruments has led to theoretically informed evaluation of the relationship between motivation and physical activity across many countries. It is imperative to develop a corresponding Chinese BREQ-3 with promising psychometric attributes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.