Abstract

In this investigation, two methods for characterizing membrane surface potential are investigated. Results from atomic force microscopy (AFM) analyses are compared with streaming potential measurements. In calculating surface potential from AFM force measurements, assumptions of constant charge and constant potential were both considered for modeling electrostatic interactions. For a ceramic mica surface, the constant charge assumption was found to be most appropriate while for a polymeric membrane surface, the constant potential assumption provided results that agreed better with theoretical expectations. For both the mica and membrane surfaces, results from AFM agreed with the measured values determined from streaming potential analysis. The advantage of AFM is that in addition to determining the mean surface potential value for membrane surfaces, this technique provides a spatially resolved measure of charge distribution. One drawback of the technique is that it is sensitive to surface roughness, as the measured charge distribution increased with increasing surface roughness.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.