Abstract
Orientation: As there has recently been a need for researchers to consider shorter personality measures, we compared the construct validity of a longer and a shorter personality measure in the South African context.Research purpose: The main purpose of this study was to examine the discriminant and convergent validity of two personality measures that measure the big five personality factors: the longer Basic Traits Inventory (BTI) and the shorter Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).Motivation for the study: Researchers have indicated a need for shorter personality measures, such as the TIPI, to assess personality dimensions. This study assessed the validity of the shorter measure in comparison with the BTI, which is considered cross-culturally valid in the South African context.Research approach, design and method: This study used a quantitative research design. Both personality measures were administered manually to a convenience sample of student participants (n = 662), and data were analysed through factor analysis utilising oblique rotation for all items.Main findings: The main findings indicate that, although the construct validity of both measures was satisfactory, the TIPI yielded unsatisfactory reliability.Practical/managerial implications: The BTI is a more reliable measure than the TIPI, which should only be used when time is limited.Contribution/value-add: In addition to providing insight into how the length of an assessment impacts on the reliability of a measure, this study further reinforces the use of the basic traits inventory as a measure that reliably measures personality in South Africa.
Highlights
Personality measures are considered important for making decisions regarding individuals
The results showed support for convergent and discriminant validity of the scales measured by the Basic Traits Inventory (BTI) and Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)
This study focused on revising and broadening the current knowledge of the TIPI and the BTI in an attempt to provide information on the appropriateness of using short or long personality questionnaires
Summary
Personality measures are considered important for making decisions regarding individuals. They are used to understand why humans behave and think as they do by identifying the unique set of traits, characteristics or attitudes of a person, understanding a person’s performance potential and possibly their career interest (Costa, 2008; Salkind, 2006; Tett & Burnett, 2003). Most personality measures are often considered long, and, in research settings (Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), candidates may experience fatigue, frustration and confusion (Saucier, 1994) whilst completing them. In South Africa, in addition to the fatigue, frustration and confusion candidates may face, there is the question of the diverse South African population (Meiring, Van de Vijver, Rothmann & Barrick, 2005).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
