Abstract

Abstract. Our work explores the impact of two important dimensions of land system changes, land use and land cover change (LULCC) as well as direct agricultural reactive nitrogen (Nr) emissions from soils, on ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in terms of air quality over contemporary (1992 to 2014) timescales. We account for LULCC and agricultural Nr emissions changes with consistent remote sensing products and new global emission inventories respectively estimating their impacts on global surface O3 and PM2.5 concentrations as well as Nr deposition using the GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model. Over this time period, our model results show that agricultural Nr emission changes cause a reduction of annual mean PM2.5 levels over Europe and northern Asia (up to −2.1 µg m−3) while increasing PM2.5 levels in India, China and the eastern US (up to +3.5 µg m−3). Land cover changes induce small reductions in PM2.5 (up to −0.7 µg m−3) over Amazonia, China and India due to reduced biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions and enhanced deposition of aerosol precursor gases (e.g., NO2, SO2). Agricultural Nr emission changes only lead to minor changes (up to ±0.6 ppbv) in annual mean surface O3 levels, mainly over China, India and Myanmar. Meanwhile, our model result suggests a stronger impact of LULCC on surface O3 over the time period across South America; the combination of changes in dry deposition and isoprene emissions results in −0.8 to +1.2 ppbv surface ozone changes. The enhancement of dry deposition reduces the surface ozone level (up to −1 ppbv) over southern China, the eastern US and central Africa. The enhancement of soil NO emission due to crop expansion also contributes to surface ozone changes (up to +0.6 ppbv) over sub-Saharan Africa. In certain regions, the combined effects of LULCC and agricultural Nr emission changes on O3 and PM2.5 air quality can be comparable (>20 %) to anthropogenic emission changes over the same time period. Finally, we calculate that the increase in global agricultural Nr emissions leads to a net increase in global land area (+3.67×106km2) that potentially faces exceedance of the critical Nr load (>5 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Our result demonstrates the impacts of contemporary LULCC and agricultural Nr emission changes on PM2.5 and O3 in terms of air quality, as well as the importance of land system changes for air quality over multidecadal timescales.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe broad term of land use and land cover change (LULCC) encapsulates both the anthropogenic (e.g. agricultural expansion) and natural (e.g. ecological succession) dimensions of terrestrial biome changes (Reick et al, 2013), which alter the physical and ecophysiological properties of the land surface

  • The broad term of land use and land cover change (LULCC) encapsulates both the anthropogenic and natural dimensions of terrestrial biome changes (Reick et al, 2013), which alter the physical and ecophysiological properties of the land surface

  • We model the effects of contemporary LULCC and agricultural emission changes, individually in combination, on surface O3 and PM2.5 using the GEOS-Chem CTM with a uniquely consistent framework that is able to integrate direct information from global emission inventories (CEDS) with updated land surface remote sensing products (ESACCI land cover and Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS) leaf area index (LAI)) on surface O3 and PM2.5, allowing us to 395 avoid invoking extra assumptions on land management practices and biophysical properties of plant functional type (PFT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The broad term of land use and land cover change (LULCC) encapsulates both the anthropogenic (e.g. agricultural expansion) and natural (e.g. ecological succession) dimensions of terrestrial biome changes (Reick et al, 2013), which alter the physical and ecophysiological properties of the land surface. These ecosystem impacts may contribute to economic loss comparable to the benefits of extra crop output from LULCC and agricultural emissions (Paulot and Jacob, 2014; Sobota et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call