Abstract

This study explored the capability of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and regularised kernel Fisher’s discriminant analysis (rkFDA) machine learning supervised classifiers in extracting flooded area from optical Landsat TM imagery. The ability of both techniques was evaluated using a case study of a riverine flood event in 2010 in a heterogeneous Mediterranean region, for which TM imagery acquired shortly after the flood event was available. For the two classifiers, both linear and non-linear (kernel) versions were utilised in their implementation. The ability of the different classifiers to map the flooded area extent was assessed on the basis of classification accuracy assessment metrics. Results showed that rkFDA outperformed SVMs in terms of accurate flooded pixels detection, also producing fewer missed detections of the flooded area. Yet, SVMs showed less false flooded area detections. Overall, the non-linear rkFDA classification method was the more accurate of the two techniques (OA = 96.23%, K = 0.877). Both methods outperformed the standard Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) thresholding (OA = 94.63, K = 0.818) by roughly 0.06 K points. Although overall accuracy results for the rkFDA and SVMs classifications only showed a somewhat minor improvement on the overall accuracy exhibited by the NDWI thresholding, notably both classifiers considerably outperformed the thresholding algorithm in other specific accuracy measures (e.g. producer accuracy for the “not flooded” class was ~10.5% less accurate for the NDWI thresholding algorithm in comparison to the classifiers, and average per-class accuracy was ~5% less accurate than the machine learning models). This study provides evidence of the successful application of supervised machine learning for classifying flooded areas in Landsat imagery, where few studies so far exist in this direction. Considering that Landsat data is open access and has global coverage, the results of this study offers important information towards exploring the possibilities of the use of such data to map other significant flood events from space in an economically viable way.

Highlights

  • The importance of floods as environmental drivers has long been recognised by many scientific disciplines

  • This study aims to compare the performances of the SVMs and regularised kernel Fisher’s discriminant analysis (rkFDA) methods in extracting flood areas in a fragmented and highly heterogeneous Mediterranean environment

  • Note that these maps were obtained by employing 200 pixels per class, a total of 400 examples for the binary flood mapping task. This number has been chosen in order to assess the behaviour of the system in a best-case scenario, which makes the comparisons of the derived flood maps fair

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of floods as environmental drivers has long been recognised by many scientific disciplines (geomorphology, biology, ecology, etc.). They entail different environmental and natural processes which provide connectivity between rivers and their floodplains, playing a key role in structuring vegetation communities and altering aquatic biota, developing floodplain habitats, forming channel morphologies, and replenishing aquifers and groundwater reservoirs within many different ecosystems [1,2,3]. Predictive global climate change models indicate that altered precipitation patterns and the increasing number of extreme rainfall events will amplify the magnitude and frequency of future flood events [9,10]. European policies have recently begun to recognise the issue of reducing exposure and vulnerability to flooding [14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call