Abstract

Aim: This qualitative study examines the intrapartum experiences of nulliparous Turkish women who participated childbirth education classes and only engaged in routine prenatal care. Material and methods: The study was conducted in a Family Health Center in primary health care service in a metropolitan city in Turkey between October 2015 and June 2016. Women engaged in routine prenatal care (RPC group) (n=17) and women participating in childbirth education classes (CEC group) (n=14) at the maternity unit were included in the study via a purposive sampling method. Data were collected in semi-structured one-on-one interviews with participants. Data were collected by The Socio-Demographic and Obstetric Information Form and The Semi-Structured Interview Form. Number, percentage, mean and standard deviation were used to evaluate descriptive data. Results: The average age of the 31 women participating was 29.33±3.75. Within the sample population, majority had an education level of university (67.74%) and a nuclear family structure (90.32%). There was no significant difference (p>.05) between the socio-demographic characteristics of both groups. Of the women participating in CEC, 92.8% in the lithotomy position; none of them received anesthesia. Within this group, 50% received no intervention during labor, while 42.86% received fundal pressure, and episiotomy was applied to 21.43% of participants. All women engaged only in RPC had their birth in the lithotomy position, and 11.76% of them received epidural anesthesia. Interventions applied included episiotomy (76.47%), induced labor (70.59%), fundal pressure (58.82%), continuous Non Stress Test (NST) (58.82%), continuous intravenous infusion (52.94%), and enema (47.05%). The statements analyzed were classified under four themes: (1) satisfaction, (2) compliance with birthing positions, (3) intrinsic concentration and (4) participant control of decision-making. Conclusion: The childbirth education classes group reported that was implemented the less intrapartum intervention, greater satisfaction, fewer distractions, greater participation in active decision-making, and a greater tendency to use non-pharmacological methods. In contrast, the routine prenatal care group mostly reported passive participation, difficulty in pain and contraction control, and greater dissatisfaction.

Highlights

  • The training provided to pregnant women and their partners by health care professionals has a key role in the antenatal period in coping with fears related to birth

  • Satisfaction Participants were asked, “Were you satisfied with your labor experience? Was as you imagined it would be?” All women who participated in Childbirth Education Classes (CEC) (14) and a few of the women who had only Routine Prenatal Care (RPC) (3) stated that their labor experience was as they imagined

  • All women in the CEC group were satisfied with their birthing experiences, many noted that routine interventions, a crowded environment, and a lack of respect for their privacy make them feel uncomfortable and that they had some regrets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The training provided to pregnant women and their partners by health care professionals has a key role in the antenatal period in coping with fears related to birth. These trainings aim to prepare expectant families for a natural birth, neonatal care, and parenting, and appear under various names, such as childbirth/antenatal/ prenatal education/preparation/training etc. Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan: 2021 Volume 18, Issue 1 informational classes for pregnant women and courses for professional healthcare trainers in Turkey. Ninety-six percent of pregnant women receive prenatal care from healthcare professionals in Turkey [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call