Abstract

Using accounts of critical events, this study examines teacher candidate decisions to modify instruction in response to ongoing classroom interaction and assessment during student teaching. Instructional changes made by candidates who reported incidents in which students had difficulty with learning goals were explored across two years. Analysis of decision making suggested that candidates during the first year lacked variation in instructional interventions and continued presenting content to students through previously used teaching strategies and materials. In the second year, candidates improved their instructional interventions, but had difficulty using objective data to describe outcomes resulting from changes made. The discussion examines changes made to teacher education curriculum after study year one to prompt teacher candidate recognition of and accommodation for diverse student needs when making instruction and assessment decisions. The use of data in reflective practice is argued as a continued need for teacher candidate development.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.