Abstract

With findings from a study conducted at the Museum of Science, Boston showed how family and school visitors used signing dictionaries in situations that involve physical interaction with phenomena. Research described in this article extended this study to an examination of how school visitors who are deaf or hard of hearing use the dictionaries in a setting, in which interactions with the phenomena are primarily observational. This additional research was conducted by TERC at the Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH). Its purpose was to examine the degree to which use of a Signing Science Pictionary and a Signing Science Dictionary results in gains in knowledge of the science content incorporated into exhibits focusing on Arthropods. The study involved 20 grade 1-6 students from a school for the deaf. They were divided into a treatment and a control group. The mixed methods design incorporated a protocol that involved a pre-test, a treatment group that used the dictionaries and a control group did not, and a post-test. Results from the pre- and post-test scores show that both groups, on average, demonstrated some gain in content knowledge. They also show that gains were similar for the treatment group and control group. Students' perceptions that they learned something support these findings. This first-of-its kind study confirmed how challenging it is to measure how the dictionaries enhance content learning beyond vocabulary learning. It also showed that additional research is needed to demonstrate impacts of the signing dictionaries on informal learning for this population.

Highlights

  • The research that is discussed in this paper examines the impact of use of such devices by students who are deaf or hard of hearing to increase knowledge of the exhibit content they encounter at a natural history museum

  • To recruit participants for the study, TERC researchers invited an urban school for the deaf and hard of hearing that was located in close proximity to the Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH) to be part of the study

  • Twenty students in grades [1,2,3,4,5,6] who were deaf or hard of hearing and used American Sign Language (ASL) for communication participated in the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Approximately 2 to 3 infants per 1,000 will have a hearing loss in at least one ear that affects communication, cognition, and educational development (National Institutes of Health, 2010). As these children mature, their literacy levels lag behind those of their hearing peers. Their literacy levels lag behind those of their hearing peers Deaf and hard of hearing children often miss out on opportunities to learn science or mathematics content from visits to informal learning environments such as natural history museums (Lang & Steely, 2003; Moon, Todd, Morton, & Ivey, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call