Abstract

The published study of Nurrenbern and Pickering in 1987 raises awareness among chemistry educators that students’ success in answering numerical questions does not necessarily reflect their degree of understanding of the related chemical concepts. Efforts have been made to provide more opportunities for students to improve their ability in answering pictorial questions in many studies in the hope that this will explore their conceptual understanding. The aim of this study was to examine the difference between students’ ability to answer algorithmic and pictorial type questions of equivalent content and level in the area of chemical kinetics. The respondents involved in this study were 335 Indonesian and UK university chemistry students. Equivalent algorithmic and pictorial question pairs in the topic of chemical kinetics were designed within a four-tier instrument. The results confirm that students’ ability to respond to the two types of questions is significantly different. The scores obtained by students in the two types of questions indicate that students’ performance in algorithmic questions is better than their performance in pictorial questions. The implications for teaching and learning chemical kinetics are also discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.