Abstract
In his study of Qur’anic structure, Michel Cuypers applied Semitic Rhetoric that has been used to analyze Biblical structure. Despite having received positive responses from Gabriel Said Reynolds and others, Cuypers’ method was criticized by Nicolai Sinai for ignoring rhyme in the Qur’an and overdoing in maintaining the existence of the ring structure in the Qur’an. This paper, then, attempts to examine this analytic method from the perspective of the Qur’anic sciences’ (‘ulu>m al-Qur’a>n). This study aims to determine proportionally the characteristics of the method and the effect it produces by using descriptive-analytic and comparative research methods. This paper argues that there are subjectivity and inconsistency in dividing the text and determining the structure of its composition, as in the study of surah al-Qa>ri‘ah by Cuypers, and an ignorance of the information about reasons for the revelations (asba>b al-nuzu>l) and Prophet’s explanation about verses. However, the application of this method can lead to a new interpretation of the Qur’an, namely by using the information in the Qur’an itself, indicators of wording around it (siya>q), and verse correlation (muna>saba>t). On the other hand, this method supports the authenticity and coherence of the Qur’anic text, which has become a debate among the Orientalists.
Highlights
The study of the quranic structure has developed in centuries
In his study of the structure of the al-Qur’an text, Michel Cuypers uses Semitic Rhetoric to analyze the structure of the Biblical text
This study found subjectivity and inconsistencies in the distribution of texts and in determining the structure of their composition, such as in the study of Surah al-Qâri’ah by Cuypers, and the neglect of the history of asbâb al-nuzȗl and the Prophet’s hadith
Summary
The study of the quranic structure has developed in centuries. Initially, it focused on discussing the word order and the style of language used in verse in order to prove the miracles of the Qur’an. In subsequent developments, the study of the qur’anic structure was on the composition of the verses in a surah. Adnane Mokrani introduced the Cuypers approach with the term ‘Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA)’ He called it a modern methodology representing a new type of dialogue, namely methodological dialogue between Biblical studies and Qur’anic studies.. C’B’A’). For example, in surah al-Muṭaffifîn (83) verses 4-6:
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
