Abstract

The Gulf of Maine (GOM) is a highly complex environment and previous studies have suggested the need to account for spatial nonstationarity in species distribution models (SDMs) for the American lobster (Homarus americanus). To explore impacts of spatial nonstationarity on species distribution, we compared models with the following three assumptions : (1) large-scale and stationary relationships between species distributions and environmental variables; (2) meso-scale models where estimated relationships differ between eastern and western GOM, and (3) finer-scale models where estimated relationships vary across eastern, central, and western regions of the GOM. The spatial scales used in these models were largely determined by the GOM coastal currents. Lobster data were sourced from the Maine-New Hampshire Inshore Bottom Trawl Survey from years 2000–2019. We considered spatial and environmental variables including latitude and longitude, bottom temperature, bottom salinity, distance from shore, and sediment grain size in the study. We forecasted distributions for the period 2028–2055 using each of these models under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 “business as usual” climate warming scenario. We found that the model with the third assumption (i.e., finest scale) performed best. This suggests that accounting for spatial nonstationarity in the GOM leads to improved distribution estimates. Large-scale models revealed a tendency to estimate global relationships that better represented a specific location within the study area, rather than estimating relationships appropriate across all spatial areas. Forecasted distributions revealed that the largest scale models tended to comparatively overestimate most season × sex × size group lobster abundances in western GOM, underestimate in the western portion of central GOM, and overestimate in the eastern portion of central GOM, with slightly less consistent and patchy trends amongst groups in eastern GOM. The differences between model estimates were greatest between the largest and finest scale models, suggesting that fine-scale models may be useful for capturing effects of unique dependencies that may operate at localized scales. We demonstrate how estimates of season-, sex-, and size- specific American lobster spatial distribution would vary based on the spatial scale assumption of nonstationarity in the GOM. This information may help develop appropriate local adaptation measures in a region that is susceptible to climate change.

Highlights

  • American lobster (Homarus americanus) is the most valuable fishery in the United States [National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2018]

  • The Gulf of Maine Coastal Currents (GMCC) can be further distinguished as two sub currents; the Eastern Maine Coastal Current (EMCC) and the Western Maine Coastal Current (WMCC), where the EMCC diverges offshore in the Penobscot Bay area and the WMCC begins along the coast (Xue et al, 2008; Chang et al, 2016)

  • Using American lobster in the Gulf of Maine (GOM) as a case study, we explore the effects of nonstationary modeling on lobster spatial distributions and compare the results to those of a stationary model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

American lobster (Homarus americanus) is the most valuable fishery in the United States [National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2018]. Environmental factors contribute to the spatial distribution of lobster abundance, and evidence of temperature, salinity, and productivity gradients that range from northeast to southwest GOM have been observed (Lynch et al, 1997; Pettigrew et al, 1998; Chang et al, 2016). These gradients may be attributed in part by the Gulf of Maine Coastal Currents (GMCC), which form cyclonic currents across the GOM (Townsend et al, 2015; Chang et al, 2016). These currents can affect environmental variables as well as processes and interactions such as primary production levels, stock-recruitment relationships, and vertical mixing (Incze et al, 2010; Chang et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call