Abstract

BackgroundThere are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis post-stroke. To prepare for an RCT and minimize misuse of resources, there is value in conducting a feasibility study.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention.MethodologyFeasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, accrual rate, sample characteristics, and identification of productive recruitment methods. Other outcomes included satisfaction with the study, fidelity, and equipoise of both staff and participants.ResultsParticipants were enrolled at a rate of 1.33 per month. The recruitment timeline had to be extended by 4 months, to meet the target of 16 randomized participants. Staggered recruitment was the most successful strategy. We found that following up with individuals who missed initial appointments prior to study enrollment led to decreased adherence.ConclusionIt is feasible to recruit and retain post-stroke participants for an intense intervention study.Trial registrationNCT02277028

Highlights

  • ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention

  • There are limited effective and evidence-based interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis poststroke

  • The findings of this study provide important information about recruitment and adherence to an intensive upper limb rehabilitation Randomized controlled trials (RCT) in pursuit of developing high impact, functional interventions for individuals affected by stroke

Read more

Summary

Objective

To examine the feasibility of recruitment and other related outcomes for an intense upper limb intervention. Methodology: Feasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, accrual rate, sample characteristics, and identification of productive recruitment methods. Other outcomes included satisfaction with the study, fidelity, and equipoise of both staff and participants

Results
Conclusion
Background
Methods
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.