Abstract
To the Editor. —Dr Ross-Degnan and colleagues 1 are to be commended for bringing to the attention of physicians the unfortunate results of drug company marketing on the prescribing practices of US physicians. However, the logic of Ross-Degnan et al weakens when they state that the risks of drugs substituted for a drug withdrawn because of unanticipated bad effects should be considered before withdrawing the drug. The drug would not have been released if the bad effects had been known beforehand. Therefore, patients who needed to be treated for conditions for which the drug was putatively indicated would have been given the substituted drugs as first choice. Ergo, no net effect.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.