Abstract
The high level of poverty, as a development challenge, in emerging countries has attracted global attention. The situation led to formulation of the Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) as well as Sustainable Development Goals (2015-2030), by United Nations, for addressing the challenge. However, the slow progress made in achieving the global millennium development goals, in developing countries has become a source of concern and thereby raising several questions that call for critical reexamination of poverty and the common strategies that have been designed to address it in developing countries.It is an undeniable fact that much resources have been spent on implementation of the global policies for addressing poverty. Again, several researches have been conducted on the subject have come out with some results which have informed policy design in addressing the challenge. However, it has been realized that many researches have concentrated on economic or monetary parameters in analysing poverty to the neglect of socio cultural parameters which are equally relevant in this context. This has led to imbalance in development paradigms for addressing poverty.Since poverty is usually measured mainly with reference to economic indicators such as income, production, total output and unemployment levels just to mention a few, positive changes in those variables are considered as a success story in addressing poverty. However,sustainability of those achievements has become a mirage in the attempt to address poverty in many developing countries.This research was undertaken as an exploratory one with the view to examining some non- economic factors that influence poverty in emerging countries but are usually played down or overlooked in examining the challenge. Among the basic research questions are: Could ethnicity and traditional governance influence negatively the welfare of some citizenry? How do cultural norms contribute to impoverishment in communities? To what extent do national policies for poverty reduction, in recent years capture noneconomic parameters which influence poverty in society? In terms of objectives, the study was designed, to assess influence oflocal governance system on poverty in communities; to review influence of traditional norms on promoting poverty and to examine the effectiveness of some national policies and strategies for poverty reduction.The outcome from the research has brought to the fore the need to address some negative institutional, cultural and attitudinal issues, in policies and strategies designed for poverty reduction in emerging countries. The point is that some of the traditional norms that influence poverty such as endowment, access to means of production, including land, widowhood rites, inheritance system, and early marriages just to mention a few, call for review or abolition to remove their negative impact on society and thereby assist to reduce poverty in some communities within some ethnic groups in Ghana. This throws a challenge to policy formulators and law makers involved in modern and traditional governance, in exercising their functions effectively as administrators and development managers. Keywords: Poverty, Ethnicity, Governance, Entitlement, Vulnerability, Empowerment DOI : 10.7176/DCS/9-3-08 Publication date :March 31 st 2019
Highlights
Poverty is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon with several dimensions
A simple definition of the phenomenon is likely to overlook many important facets of this development challenge.For example, economic bias analysts define poverty with reference to specific daily wage earned by employees, below that wage level, one is considered poor.This definition implies that increasing one’s daily wage above acertain threshold would take one out of the poverty bracket.It might be argued, that, the definition has ignored several variables that are associated with poverty and livelihood
From the foregoing analysis, it is obvious that understanding ethnicity, traditional norms, and principles of governance is essential in designing sustainable policies for addressing poverty
Summary
Poverty is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon with several dimensions. it has been defined in different ways using different variables. A simple definition of the phenomenon is likely to overlook many important facets of this development challenge.For example, economic bias analysts define poverty with reference to specific daily wage earned by employees, below that wage level, one is considered poor.This definition implies that increasing one’s daily wage above acertain threshold would take one out of the poverty bracket.It might be argued, that, the definition has ignored several variables that are associated with poverty and livelihood. This is making reference to www.iiste.org income and affordability in poverty analysis In this context, a poor person could be described asone whose income is not enough to acquireminimum bundle or basket of goods and services (food and nonfood) deemed adequate for meeting one’s consumption needs for survival.The implication of this argument is that anyone who cannot acquire adequate goods to satisfy his/her minimum basic consumption needs could be considered as a poor person irrespective of the level of daily wage earned. This submission seeks to describe poverty in relation to “acquisition difficulty” which is often neglected, in poverty analyses.It could be emphasized that the ability to acquire goods and services for consumption and survival is influenced by both exogenous and endogenous factors which is related to the environment in which one dwells
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
