Abstract

Abstract. The Fraser River Basin (FRB) of British Columbia is one of the largest and most important watersheds in western North America, and home to a rich diversity of biological species and economic assets that depend implicitly upon its extensive riverine habitats. The hydrology of the FRB is dominated by snow accumulation and melt processes, leading to a prominent annual peak streamflow invariably occurring in May–July. Nevertheless, while annual peak daily streamflow (APF) during the spring freshet in the FRB is historically well correlated with basin-averaged, 1 April snow water equivalent (SWE), there are numerous occurrences of anomalously large APF in below- or near-normal SWE years, some of which have resulted in damaging floods in the region. An imperfect understanding of which other climatic factors contribute to these anomalously large APFs hinders robust projections of their magnitude and frequency. We employ the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) process-based hydrological model driven by gridded observations to investigate the key controlling factors of anomalous APF events in the FRB and four of its subbasins that contribute nearly 70 % of the annual flow at Fraser-Hope. The relative influence of a set of predictors characterizing the interannual variability of rainfall, snowfall, snowpack (characterized by the annual maximum value, SWEmax), soil moisture and temperature on simulated APF at Hope (the main outlet of the FRB) and at the subbasin outlets is examined within a regression framework. The influence of large-scale climate modes of variability (the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation – ENSO) on APF magnitude is also assessed, and placed in context with these more localized controls. The results indicate that next to SWEmax (univariate Spearman correlation with APF of ρ^ = 0.64; 0.70 (observations; VIC simulation)), the snowmelt rate (ρ^ = 0.43 in VIC), the ENSO and PDO indices (ρ^ = −0.40; −0.41) and (ρ^ = −0.35; −0.38), respectively, and rate of warming subsequent to the date of SWEmax (ρ^ = 0.26; 0.38), are the most influential predictors of APF magnitude in the FRB and its subbasins. The identification of these controls on annual peak flows in the region may be of use in understanding seasonal predictions or future projected streamflow changes.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Study domain and motivationThe response of nival watersheds across the Northern Hemisphere to ongoing warming of the climate system is a topic of intense interest to those interested in the water–climate nexus

  • The mutual resemblance of the correlograms (Figs. 3b and 6), which summarize the univariate linear regression fits to observed and Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) data, along with the similar forms of the respective MLR models (Eqs. 1–3), give one further confidence in the ability of the VIC model to simulate interactions between the key controls of streamflow acting in the real system

  • The use of more complete snow survey or satellite products might permit the estimation of SWElen or snowmelt rate, and confirmation of the influence of these terms appearing in the VIC-derived MLR, Eq (6)

Read more

Summary

Study domain and motivation

The response of nival watersheds across the Northern Hemisphere to ongoing warming of the climate system is a topic of intense interest to those interested in the water–climate nexus. W. Zwiers: Examining controls on peak annual streamflow and floods (Fraser River Basin) the analysis of a host of variables that respond to historical climate forcings via physically consistent relationships. Zwiers: Examining controls on peak annual streamflow and floods (Fraser River Basin) the analysis of a host of variables that respond to historical climate forcings via physically consistent relationships We apply such a model to the Fraser River Basin (FRB) of British Columbia (BC), Canada, a large, representative nival watershed, to study the dominant climatic controls on both observed and modelled hydrologic change. Several catchments in the lower FRB, and to the west of the basin in the Coast Mountains and Western Cascades, exhibit annual streamflow peaks coinciding with the maximum of Pacific frontal rainstorm occurrence in October–December (Eaton and Moore, 2010; Padilla et al, 2015)

Previous studies of climate and streamflow change in the FRB
Study domain and observational data
Hydrological model and boundary forcing
Selection of predictors and analysis methods
Trends in observed time series
Influence of large-scale climate modes on observed streamflow at Fraser-Hope
Basin-scale relationships amongst observed variables
Temperature
Rainfall
Relationships amongst observed predictors
Multivariate regression
Observed versus VIC-simulated streamflow and SWE
Relationships amongst VIC-simulated variables
Influence of large-scale climate modes on streamflow at Fraser-Hope
Snow water equivalent and snowmelt
Soil moisture
Temperature and rainfall
Relationships amongst VIC-simulated variables at the subbasin scale
Co-dependence of streamflow predictors
Case studies: high-flow years in the FRB
Warm spring in an average SWE year
A high-SWE year
Influence of rainfall in a high-SWE year
The two highest flow years in the FRB
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call