Abstract

<p>The concepts of sustainability, and sustainability planning, have become prominent in the last thirty years. In 2005, the Canadian government created a budget plan that was intended to fund infrastructure projects in municipalities across the country, as well as catalyze and strengthen sustainability planning within municipalities across the nation. In order for municipalities to receive the funding they needed to create Integrated Community Sustainability Plans (ICSPs) or provincial variants (ex. strategic sustainability plans). This thesis comparatively analyzes select integrated community sustainability plans in the Province of Ontario, Canada with specific focus placed on how and whether ICSPs address, define and advance social equity goals and principles in sustainability planning. Two questions drive the research: 1) How have ICSPs considered equity principles in their design and implementation; and, 2) How does variation in the degree of community involvement in sustainability planning influence how equity is addressed? This study draws upon qualitative methods including a comparative document analysis of ICSPs in Ontario and semi-structured key informant interviews. The overall findings suggested that equity was not strongly considered in the ICSPs analysed. There were few key results that emphasised this. Firstly there was a disconnect between policy goals and details within implementation strategies. There was found to be a lack of prioritization of equity, particularly with meaningful consideration of distributional equity. Lastly a lack of prescriptive guidance by the federal government and FCM with respect to goals and implementation.</p>

Highlights

  • This chapter will outline the results and key findings found in both the document analysis of the six municipal sustainability plans, as well as the key informant interviews that were conducted

  • Some of the emergent findings from the literature review are that there is a focus and encouragement of green infrastructure within the Integrated Community Sustainability Plans (ICSPs) program, versus a more holistic approach to sustainability that encourages all three pillars. Research complements this focus by highlighting the lack of social equity within the ICSPs created across Canada

  • That is really tough and does not happen very often. [There are] examples of participatory budgeting in New York, and other places in South America where communities get together and they literally decide together what they want to spend their community budget on. 4.4 Chapter Conclusion The results found throughout the document analysis and semi – structured interviews show that there were some attempts of consideration and addressing social equity and social sustainability concerns within the ICSPs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This chapter will outline the results and key findings found in both the document analysis of the six municipal sustainability plans, as well as the key informant interviews that were conducted. Results from the key informant interviews will be discussed. This analysis shows that social equity principles were not prioritized for the majority of municipalities that had created ICSPs and other sustainability plan variants. Even with the federal requirement to consider both social and cultural sustainability (Infrastructure Canada 2008) the results show that very little prioritization and strong active commitment was given to these two dimensions of sustainability. This lack of prioritization of strong social and cultural dimensions of sustainability leads to little engagement with equity principles

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call