Abstract

BackgroundThe process of designing a digital health intervention (DHI)—also referred to as mobile health or eHealth—spans needs assessments, technical functionality and feasibility, user satisfaction, effectiveness, impact, and value. These interventions are causing a rapid evolution in the landscape of health care. Multiple studies have shown their propensity to extend both the quality and reach of interventions. However, failure to improve DHI design is linked to failed uptake and health outcomes. This dilemma is further conflicted by the colliding backdrops of the digital and health industries, both of which approach, understand, and involve end users differently in the framing of a DHI.ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to assess the challenges to incorporating end users in the design stage of digital health interventions, to identify key pain points, and to identify limitations and gaps for areas of future investigation.MethodsThe PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist will be used to structure this protocol. A systematic search of the PsycINFO, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore databases will be conducted. Additionally, the PerSPEcTiF guidelines for complex interventions will be consulted. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. Two reviewers will independently extract and validate data from the included studies into a standardized form and conduct quality appraisal.ResultsAs of February 2021, we have completed a preliminary literature search examining challenges to the incorporation of end users in the design stage of DHIs. Systematic searches, data extraction and analysis, and writing of the systematic review are expected to be completed by December 2021.ConclusionsThis systematic review aims to provide an effective summary of key pain points toward incorporating end users in DHIs. Results from this review will provide an evidence base for a better approach to end user involvement in the interest of improving efficacy and uptake of DHIs.Trial RegistrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021238164; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=238164International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/28083

Highlights

  • BackgroundDigital health interventions (DHIs), often referred to as mobile health or eHealth, are dynamic solutions that span needs assessments, technical functionality and feasibility, user satisfaction, effectiveness, impact, and value [1]

  • A preliminary search for existing systematic reviews on the topic of end user challenges in DHIs has been conducted in the following major databases: CINAHL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PROSPERO, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

  • We found no specific qualitative synthesis systematic reviews that collected the challenges in working with end users in DHIs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Digital health interventions (DHIs), often referred to as mobile health (mHealth) or eHealth, are dynamic solutions that span needs assessments, technical functionality and feasibility, user satisfaction, effectiveness, impact, and value [1]. The process of designing a digital health intervention (DHI)— referred to as mobile health or eHealth—spans needs assessments, technical functionality and feasibility, user satisfaction, effectiveness, impact, and value. These interventions are causing a rapid evolution in the landscape of health care. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the challenges to incorporating end users in the design stage of digital health interventions, to identify key pain points, and to identify limitations and gaps for areas of future investigation. Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021238164; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=238164 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28083

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call