Examining associations between two different jumping to conclusions scores with positive schizotypy and recent distress

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Jumping to conclusions is associated with delusions. It is unclear whether positive schizotypy, which refers to delusion-like and hallucination-like symptoms, is associated with jumping to conclusions. Relatedly, the relative validity of two jumping to conclusions scores, extreme responding and draws to decision, is unclear, particularly whether extreme responding (responding after one or two draws) reflects the same bias as decreased draws to decision on non-extreme responding trials.Methods: Extreme positive schizotypy individuals with increased psychosis risk (n = 69) and controls (n = 95) completed the Probabilistic Reasoning Task and reported on recent distress, which was previously associated with jumping to conclusions. We calculated extreme responding, draws to decision (number of draws), and draws to decision/non-extreme responding (number of draws on trials with three or more draws).Results: Positive schizotypy was associated with extreme responding, but not draws to decision/non-extreme responding. Furthermore, draws to decision and draws to decision/non-extreme responding were associated with recent distress, whereas extreme responding was not.Conclusion: Positive schizotypy was specifically associated with extreme responding and not draws to decision/non-extreme responding, which suggests that the nature of extreme responding and of draws to decision might be different. This could have relevance for assessing and treating jumping to conclusions.