Abstract

Background and ObjectiveIn context of the End TB goal of zero tuberculosis (TB)-affected households encountering catastrophic costs due to TB by 2020, the estimation of national prevalence of catastrophic costs due to TB is a priority to inform programme design. We explore approaches to estimate the national prevalence of catastrophic costs due to TB from existing datasets as an alternative to nationally representative surveys.MethodsWe obtained, standardized and merged three patient-level datasets from existing studies on patient-incurred costs due to TB in South Africa. A deterministic cohort model was developed with the aim of estimating the national prevalence of catastrophic costs, using national data on the prevalence of TB and likelihood of loss to follow-up by income quintile and HIV status. Two approaches were tested to parameterize the model with existing cost data. First, a meta-analysis summarized study-level data by HIV status and income quintile. Second, a regression analysis of patient-level data also included employment status, education level and urbanicity. We summarized findings by type of cost and examined uncertainty around resulting estimates.ResultsOverall, the median prevalence of catastrophic costs for the meta-analysis and regression approaches were 11% (interquartile range [IQR] 9–13%) and 6% (IQR 5–8%), respectively. Both approaches indicated that the main burden of catastrophic costs falls on the poorest households. An individual-level regression analysis produced lower uncertainty around estimates than a study-level meta-analysis.ConclusionsThis paper presents a novel application of existing data to estimate the national prevalence of catastrophic costs due to TB. This type of model could be useful for researchers and policy makers looking to inform certain policy decisions; however, some uncertainties remain due to limitations in data availability. There is an urgent need for standardized reporting of cost data and improved guidance on methods to collect income data to improve these estimates going forward.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00898-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • 2 MethodsTuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide, with 10 million people falling ill and 1.2 million people dying from TB in 2018 [1]

  • We aim to investigate approaches to model the national prevalence of catastrophic costs due to TB using the case study of South Africa, which has one of the world’s highest TB incidence rates, with an estimated incidence of 520 per 100,000 people in 2018 [12]

  • We present estimates of the prevalence of catastrophic costs associated with TB, employing an individual-level cohort model using two approaches to parameterize cost estimates: a meta-analysis approach using study-level statistics and a regression approach using individual-level primary data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

2 MethodsTuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide, with 10 million people falling ill and 1.2 million people dying from TB in 2018 [1]. Results Overall, the median prevalence of catastrophic costs for the meta-analysis and regression approaches were 11% (interquartile range [IQR] 9–13%) and 6% (IQR 5–8%), respectively. Both approaches indicated that the main burden of catastrophic costs falls on the poorest households. This type of model could be useful for researchers and policy makers looking to inform certain policy decisions; some uncertainties remain due to limitations in data availability. There is an urgent need for standardized reporting of cost data and improved guidance on methods to collect income data to improve these estimates going forward

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call