Abstract

In many ways, dogs are an ideal model for the study of genetic erosion and population recovery, problems of major concern in the field of conservation genetics. Genetic diversity in many dog breeds has been declining systematically since the beginning of the 1800s, when modern breeding practices came into fashion. As such, inbreeding in domestic dog breeds is substantial and widespread and has led to an increase in recessive deleterious mutations of high effect as well as general inbreeding depression. Pedigrees can in theory be used to guide breeding decisions, though are often incomplete and do not reflect the full history of inbreeding. Small microsatellite panels are also used in some cases to choose mating pairs to produce litters with low levels of inbreeding. However, the long‐term impact of such practices has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we use forward simulation on a model of the dog genome to examine the impact of using limited marker panels to guide pairwise mating decisions on genome‐wide population‐level genetic diversity. Our results suggest that in unmanaged populations, where breeding decisions are made at the pairwise—rather than population‐level, such panels can lead to accelerated loss of genetic diversity at genome regions unlinked to panel markers, compared to random mating. These results demonstrate the importance of genome‐wide genetic panels for managing and conserving genetic diversity in dogs and other companion animals.

Highlights

  • Loss of genetic diversity in small populations is a major concern of the global conservation community because it can reduce fitness and adaptability, and can lead to breed, population, or species extinction (O’Grady et al, 2006)

  • Our results suggest that in unsupervised mating schemes, where breeding decisions are made at the pairwise- rather than population-level, such panels can lead to accelerated loss of genetic diversity compared to random mating at regions of the genome unlinked to panel markers and demonstrate the importance of genome-wide genetic panels for managing and conserving genetic diversity in dogs and other companion animals

  • Direct comparison of microsatellite panel and genome-wide (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) panel estimates of genetic diversity are rare, but the argument of Nicholas and colleagues is supported by a recent direct comparison in Arabidopsis halleri, which found that microsatellite-based estimates of genetic diversity and population differentiation differ substantially from unbiased estimates from SNPs (Fischer et al, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Loss of genetic diversity in small populations is a major concern of the global conservation community because it can reduce fitness and adaptability, and can lead to breed, population, or species extinction (O’Grady et al, 2006). Though, as Nicholas and colleagues (*Nicholas, Mellersh, & Lewis, 2018) recently pointed out, such small microsatellite panels do not effectively survey genome-wide genetic diversity. Rather, they survey genetic diversity at and near (depending on the extent of linkage disequilibrium) the assayed microsatellites. Direct comparison of microsatellite panel and genome-wide (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) panel estimates of genetic diversity are rare, but the argument of Nicholas and colleagues is supported by a recent direct comparison in Arabidopsis halleri, which found that microsatellite-based estimates of genetic diversity and population differentiation differ substantially from unbiased estimates from SNPs (Fischer et al, 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.