Abstract

This chapter examines the extent to which methodological differences produce variations in multidimensional poverty index (MPI) values and corresponding measures of deprivation incidence and intensity in the United States. Application of the methodologies employed in 10 prior studies to a common data set and period (i.e., annual ACS-PUMS data for the years 2008 through 2019) reveals considerable heterogeneity in MPI values and the incidence of multidimensional poverty (i.e., the headcount ratio). Across methodologies, lesser variation exists in the average intensity of multidimensional deprivation. The primary factors driving variation in MPI values are differences in the numbers of indicators and dimensions employed, the choice of indicators, the grouping of indicators into dimensions, and the resulting differences in indicator and dimension weights. Given these findings, and as multidimensional poverty analysis has important implications for public policy, a set of best practices is recommended to produce more uniform measurement of multidimensional poverty in the United States.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.