Abstract

AbstractThe opening and closure behaviour of short fatigue cracks is seen as one of the important phenomena which control fatigue life of components where a major part of life consists of the growth of short cracks. Therefore attempts are undertaken to experimentally assess and to model the behaviour of short cracks with respect to opening and closure. In this paper crack opening results obtained by Sunder et al. through SEM evaluation of striation patterns of 2000 series aluminium alloys are examined and compared to predictions using a model recently developed for fatigue life prediction based on fracture mechanics of short cracks. Sunder's technique for crack opening measurements involves particular load sequences with increasing and decreasing load ranges applied to notched specimens with naturally nucleated surface cracks where crack opening levels are identified by steady‐state striation widths for increasing load ranges. A detailed review of Sunder's results, however, indicates a number of inconsistencies and contradictions which are discussed.Opening and closure behaviour of short fatigue cracks, in particular for inelastic conditions, is compared to predictions obtained with the above‐mentioned model which incorporates a constant strain opening and closure assumption. For inelastic conditions that may develop at notches this assumption means that cracks would close at considerably lower stress levels as compared to the opening stress which becomes important when effective (local) stress‐strain ranges are to be determined for fatigue life prediction under spectrum loading. The constant strain assumption is supported by a number of experimental observations from the literature as discussed in the paper. The approximative nature of this assumption and further details of the model are pointed out which show a need for further developments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call