Examination of Measured to Predicted Hydraulic Properties for Low Impact Development Substrates

Abstract

To counter the impacts of climate change and urbanization, engineers have developed ingenious solutions to reduce flooding and capture stormwater contaminants through the use of Low Impact Developments (LIDs). The soil is generally considered to be completely saturated when designing for the LIDs. However, this may not always be an accurate or realistic approach, as the soil could be variably unsaturated leading to inaccurate designs. To analyse the flow under variably unsaturated conditions, Richards’ equation can be used. To solve the Richards’ equation, two nonlinear hydraulic properties, namely soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function are required. Laboratory and field measurements of unsaturated hydraulic properties are cumbersome, expensive and time- consuming. Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) estimate soil hydraulic properties using routinely measured soil properties. This paper presents a comparison between the direct measurement obtained through experimental procedures and the use of PTFs to estimate soil hydraulic properties for two green roof and three bioretention soil medias. Comparison between the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties was accomplished using two different approaches. Statistical analyses and visual comparisons were used to compare the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties. Additionally, numerical modelling to predict the water balance at the ground surface was conducted using the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties. In some instances, the use of predicted hydraulic properties resulted in overestimation of the cumulative net infiltration of as much as 60 % for the green roof substrate, but was considered negligible for the bioretention substrate. Design performance criteria for green roof and bioretention facilities were examined using the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties under extreme precipitation analysis. Results indicate that there is a high level of uncertainty when using PTFs for LID materials. A percent difference between the measured and predicted properties for the green roof peak time delay under a 2-year storm can be as much as 300%. For the bioretention design criteria of a 25-year storm, the surface runoff was overestimated by 14.7 cm and by 100% for the ponding time percent difference.