Abstract

This study assessed the perceptual assimilation model (PAM) predictions about assimilation types and discrimination performance through the lens of assimilation overlap in Quebec French listeners' perception of nine non-native Korean stop consonants. The consonants varied in voicing (fortis, lenis, and aspirated) and place of articulation (labials, coronals, and velars). In the identification experiment, the Korean three-way voicing contrasts were found to undergo an assimilation overlap to correspond to the French two-way equivalent contrasts across places of articulation. In the discrimination experiment, assimilation overlap tended to hinder detection of non-native speech distinctions, which is in line with the PAM-based suggestion.

Highlights

  • Discrimination of non-native speech contrasts should be more difficult when the two phonemes are perceived as highly similar

  • This study aimed to explore the applicability of the perceptual assimilation model (PAM) framework to three-way stop voicing contrast perception and examine the role of assimilation overlap in discrimination performance

  • Our results showed that discrimination generally tends to be modulated as a function of assimilation overlap

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Discrimination of non-native speech contrasts should be more difficult when the two phonemes are perceived as highly similar. Nam (2018) found that Korean listeners identified English /tS/, /dZ/, and /Z/ as Korean /tS/, whereas they mapped English /S/ to Korean /s/. They were appreciably more accurate at discriminating the corresponding English affricate-fricative contrasts when the two non-native phones did not have identification overlap (/tSa-Sa/, 92% correct) than when they did (/dZa-Za/, 61% correct). This observation points to the relationship between non-native contrasts’ identification and their discrimination, the role of identification overlap. The PAM assigns six assimilation types to non-native contrasts: (1) For the two-category (TC) type, the two contrasting non-native phones are assimilated to different native phonemes; (2) for the single-category (SC) type, both non-native phones are assimilated to the same native phoneme with the same level of perceived similarity to that native phoneme; (3) for the category-goodness (CG) type, both phones are assimilated to the same native phoneme, but one phone is perceived as a better instance of the native category than the other; (4) for the uncategorized-categorized (UC) type, one non-native phone matches a native phoneme but the other is not assimilated to any single native phoneme above a categorization (or statistical) threshold; (5) for the uncategorized-uncategorized (UU) type, neither non-native phone is assimilated to any single native phoneme; and (6) for the non-assimilable (NA) type, neither non-native phone is perceived as speech

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call