Examination of ecological validity of intuitive eating

Abstract

BackgroundIntuitive eating, which involves following internal cues of hunger and satiety to guide eating choices, would be better understood if studied at the individual momentary level instead of globally or cross-sectionally. The current study employed ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine the ecological validity of a popular intuitive eating measure, the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES-2). MethodCollege males and females completed a baseline assessment of trait levels of intuitive eating as measured by the IES-2. Participants then followed a seven-day EMA protocol where they completed brief smart phone assessments about intuitive eating and related constructs while in their natural daily environments. Participants were asked to complete recordings before and after eating about their state level of intuitive eating at that moment. ResultsAmong 104 participants, 87.5% were female, mean age was 24.3, and mean BMI was 26.3. Baseline trait level intuitive eating was significantly correlated with state level intuitive eating reported across EMA recordings, with some evidence suggesting that correlations were stronger before eating compared to after eating. Intuitive eating generally was related to less negative affect, fewer eating restrictions, and more anticipated taste enjoyment before eating, as well as less guilt and regret after eating. DiscussionIndividuals who reported high trait levels of intuitive eating also reported following their internal cues for hunger and satiety and had less guilt, regret, and negative affect surrounding eating in their naturalistic environments, thereby supporting the ecological validity of the IES-2.