Abstract

AbstractThe amine titration method using Hammett and arylmethanol indicators has been examined on selected samples of porous silica, active alumina and synthetic zeolites. On the basis of the successive approximation technique the evaluation of surface acid strength distribution has been standardised. A new method has been developed to assess the total acidity without employing indicators. The distinction between Bronsted and Lewis acidity through measuring the Ho and HR acidity distribution function on aluminas and zeolites is shown to be erroneous. The acidity is strongly affected by the size of amine and by the density of surface acid centres—as demonstrated on a series of silicas and on synthetic zeolites. The size dependence can be utilised to detect the acidity of distinct pore size ranges within a given porous solid. Under certain conditions the acidity measurements can be correlated with those obtained from other techniques such as heterogeneous exchange and infrared spectroscopy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.