Abstract
This paper purports to analyze the verificationist theory of meaning proposed by logical positivism. According to this theory, only sentences verifiably by means of empirical observation have meanings. Our purpose is to show the reasons why the verificationist theory collapses. In order to do so, we will examine both the internal and external critiques to it. Among the internal critiques, we will show the logical positivists’ failed attempts to formulate an adequate weak verification criterion. Among the external critiques, we will focus on the ones formulated by J.L. Austin on the basis of his theory of performative utterances.
Highlights
This paper purports to analyze the verificationist theory of meaning proposed by logical positivism
We will focus on the ones formulated by J.L
Los positivistas lógicos establecieron que todo nuestro conocimiento del mundo debía estar basado en la experiencia sensible; por lo cual, toda oración cuya verdad no pueda ser verificada por la experiencia debe considerarse, no solo injustificada, sino un sinsentido[214]
Summary
This paper purports to analyze the verificationist theory of meaning proposed by logical positivism. Los positivistas lógicos establecieron que todo nuestro conocimiento del mundo debía estar basado en la experiencia sensible; por lo cual, toda oración cuya verdad no pueda ser verificada por la experiencia debe considerarse, no solo injustificada, sino un sinsentido[214] (como la metafísica, la ética y la teología).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.