Abstract

We study in detail the Schrödinger equation corresponding to the four dimensional SU(2) mathcal{N} = 2 SQCD theory with one flavour. We calculate the Voros symbols, or quantum periods, in four different ways: Borel summation of the WKB series, direct computation of Wronskians of exponentially decaying solutions, the TBA equations of Gaiotto-Moore-Neitzke/Gaiotto, and instanton counting. We make computations by all of these methods, finding good agreement. We also study the exact quantization condition for the spectrum, and we compute the Fredholm determinant of the inverse of the Schrödinger operator using the TS/ST correspondence and Zamolodchikov’s TBA, again finding good agreement. In addition, we explore two aspects of the relationship between singularities of the Borel transformed WKB series and BPS states: BPS states of the 4d theory are related to singularities in the Borel transformed WKB series for the quantum periods, and BPS states of a coupled 2d+4d system are related to singularities in the Borel transformed WKB series for local solutions of the Schrödinger equation.

Highlights

  • This paper concerns a detailed exploration of the relation between Schrödinger equations and N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories, from several different points of view

  • We study in detail the Schrödinger equation corresponding to the four dimensional SU(2) N = 2 SQCD theory with one flavour

  • We explore two aspects of the relationship between singularities of the Borel transformed WKB series and BPS states: BPS states of the 4d theory are related to singularities in the Borel transformed WKB series for the quantum periods, and BPS states of a coupled 2d+4d system are related to singularities in the Borel transformed WKB series for local solutions of the Schrödinger equation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The classical periods Zγ control the central charges and masses of BPS states, while the quantum periods Πγ can be computed in terms of the Nekrasov-Shatashvili instanton partition function.. The classical periods Zγ control the central charges and masses of BPS states, while the quantum periods Πγ can be computed in terms of the Nekrasov-Shatashvili instanton partition function.3 This connection has been derived from various different points of view, including direct gauge theory computations and class S constructions using the AGT correspondence; see e.g. 1.2 The SU(2) Nf = 1 equation In this paper we consider a specific example of (1.1): This equation corresponds to N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory with gauge group SU(2) and Nf = 1;4 Λ ∈ C× is the dynamical scale, m ∈ C is the hypermultiplet mass, and E ∈ C parameterizes the Coulomb branch

Computing the quantum periods
Fredholm determinant
Quantization condition
Comments
Walls and chambers
Chamber structure for quantum periods
Borel summation
All-orders WKB
Borel summation of the local solutions
A strong coupling point
A weak coupling point
Stokes graphs and Borel poles for the local solutions
Borel summation for quantum periods
The one-loop sign
Padé-Borel computation of quantum periods
Rules for writing down Wronskians
Global structure of the Stokes graph
Exponentially decaying solutions
We include an overall sign factor exp dP γP
Quantum periods in strong coupling region
Quantum periods in weak coupling region
The GMN TBA
A special point
Computation by instanton counting
Definitions
Quantum periods
Comparisons
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call