Abstract

Biological tools such as genetic lineage tracing, three-dimensional confocal microscopy and next-generation DNA sequencing are providing new ways to quantify the distribution of clones of normal and mutated cells. Understanding population-wide clone size distributions in vivo is complicated by multiple cell types within observed tissues, and overlapping birth and death processes. This has led to the increased need for mathematically informed models to understand their biological significance. Standard approaches usually require knowledge of clonal age. We show that modelling on clone size independent of time is an alternative method that offers certain analytical advantages; it can help parametrize these models, and obtain distributions for counts of mutated or proliferating cells, for example. When applied to a general birth–death process common in epithelial progenitors, this takes the form of a gambler's ruin problem, the solution of which relates to counting Motzkin lattice paths. Applying this approach to mutational processes, alternative, exact, formulations of classic Luria–Delbrück-type problems emerge. This approach can be extended beyond neutral models of mutant clonal evolution. Applications of these approaches are twofold. First, we resolve the probability of progenitor cells generating proliferating or differentiating progeny in clonal lineage tracing experiments in vivo or cell culture assays where clone age is not known. Second, we model mutation frequency distributions that deep sequencing of subclonal samples produce.

Highlights

  • One approach to understanding the cellular hierarchy in multicellular organized tissue has been tracking the fate of individual cells either labelled in vivo or isolated ex vivo [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Improved techniques, including genetic lineage tracing and three-dimensional imaging by confocal microscopy, have helped us further investigate this basic area of research and have rapidly become the gold standard approach [7,8,9]

  • We note that we have the zero mutant probability p(0k) 1⁄4 q(kk) 1⁄4 mk0À1 1⁄4 (1 À m1)kÀ1, reflecting the requirement that all k 2 1 divisions are mutant free. We can compare this with the classic result of Luria –Delbruck, which states that p0 1⁄4 e2m, where m is the mean number of mutations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One approach to understanding the cellular hierarchy in multicellular organized tissue has been tracking the fate of individual cells either labelled in vivo or isolated ex vivo [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The second estimation approach is to relate the probabilities a and c to the subsequent clone size distribution of tagged cells This approach requires sufficient time for the development of substantive clones, which will contain a mixture of differentiated and proliferating cells. This was implemented in [2] for example, where estimates of a 1⁄4 c 1⁄4 0.1 + 0.01 and b 1⁄4 0.80 + 0.02 were obtained This approach involves months of clonal development and is sensitive to the loss of shedding differentiated cells from the suprabasal layer, which is difficult to quantify. Both techniques highlight a desire for a method that can both circumvent some of these technical challenges and is relatively quick to implement. We obtain distributions for the number of mutant cells in a clone undergoing a pure birth process

Distribution of colony sizes in homeostatic tissue
Motzkin paths describe the entire distribution of colony sizes
Gambler’s ruin
Estimating differentiation probabilities
Exact distributions of Luria –Delbruck type
The neutral model
Incorporating selection
Distributions of subclones in mutated colonies
The number of cells containing a specific mutation
Distribution of the number of clones
Size distribution of mutant clones
Number of mutations in a random clone
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call