Abstract

BackgroundSolving median tree problems under tree reconciliation costs is a classic and well-studied approach for inferring species trees from collections of discordant gene trees. These problems are NP-hard, and therefore are, in practice, typically addressed by local search heuristics. So far, however, such heuristics lack any provable correctness or precision. Further, even for small phylogenetic studies, it has been demonstrated that local search heuristics may only provide sub-optimal solutions. Obviating such heuristic uncertainties are exact dynamic programming solutions that allow solving tree reconciliation problems for smaller phylogenetic studies. Despite these promises, such exact solutions are only suitable for credibly rooted input gene trees, which constitute only a tiny fraction of the readily available gene trees. Standard gene tree inference approaches provide only unrooted gene trees and accurately rooting such trees is often difficult, if not impossible.ResultsHere, we describe complex dynamic programming solutions that represent the first nonnaïve exact solutions for solving the tree reconciliation problems for unrooted input gene trees. Further, we show that the asymptotic runtime of the proposed solutions does not increase when compared to the most time-efficient dynamic programming solutions for rooted input trees.ConclusionsIn an experimental evaluation, we demonstrate that the described solutions for unrooted gene trees are, like the solutions for rooted input gene trees, suitable for smaller phylogenetic studies. Finally, for the first time, we study the accuracy of classic local search heuristics for unrooted tree reconciliation problems.

Highlights

  • Solving median tree problems under tree reconciliation costs is a classic and well-studied approach for inferring species trees from collections of discordant gene trees

  • We study the accuracy of classic local search heuristics for unrooted median tree reconciliation problems, and demonstrate that it typically requires a large number of independent heuristic runs to find an exact median tree for already small scale phylogenetic studies

  • Note that the standard definition of the deep coalescence cost function [40] differs by 1 − |VG | from our definition, which is a constant value for a fixed G, and the results presented in this work can be adapted for the standard definition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solving median tree problems under tree reconciliation costs is a classic and well-studied approach for inferring species trees from collections of discordant gene trees. These problems are NP-hard, and are, in practice, typically addressed by local search heuristics. Even for small phylogenetic studies, it has been demonstrated that local search heuristics may only provide sub-optimal solutions Obviating such heuristic uncertainties are exact dynamic programming solutions that allow solving tree reconciliation problems for smaller phylogenetic studies. Despite these promises, such exact solutions are only suitable for credibly rooted input gene trees, which constitute only a tiny fraction of the readily available gene trees. The gene is a portion of the species’ genomes, and it is assumed that the corresponding gene tree is mimicking the evolution of the species.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.