Abstract

We address a real-world scheduling problem where the objective is to allocate a set of tasks to a set of machines and to a set of workers in such a way that the total weighted tardiness is minimized. Our case study encompasses four types of constraints: precedence, resource, eligibility, and contiguity. While the first three constraints are common in the scheduling literature, contiguity constraints, which can be defined as a form of precedence constraints that requires both a predecessor and its successor to be processed on the same machine with no intermediate jobs in-between (but idle time is allowed), have never been studied in the literature. We present four exact methods to solve the problem: two methods use integer linear programming, one uses constraint programming, and one uses a combinatorial Benders’ decomposition. We introduce method-specific strategies to model the contiguity constraints for each of the proposed methods. We empirically evaluate, through an extensive set of computational experiments, the performance of the four methods on a heterogeneous dataset composed of real, realistic, and random instances, and outline that every method offers a competitive advantage on a targeted subset of instances. We also show that our algorithms can be generalized to solve related scheduling problems with contiguity constraints.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call