Ex vivo evaluation of the Ozaki procedure in comparison with the native aortic valve and prosthetic valves.

Abstract

OBJECTIVESWe investigated the hydrodynamic performance and cusp kinematics of the Ozaki neocuspidized aortic valve in comparison with the native aortic and prosthetic valves in an ex vivo study.METHODSNative aortic valves of swine hearts were replaced by aortic valve substitutes, and their hydrodynamic performance (effective orifice area and mean pressure gradient) was evaluated in a mock circulation under defined conditions. The following aortic valve substitutes were investigated: native aortic valve, Ozaki valve, Perimount Magna Ease, Trifecta and St. Jude Medical Masters. All prosthetic valves had a labelled size of 21 mm.RESULTSThe Ozaki valve and native aortic valve showed a similar and significantly larger orifice area than all investigated prosthetic valves particularly at high flow rates. There was no significant difference between the Ozaki valve and the native aortic valve. The native aortic valve and Ozaki valve showed a similar increase in orifice area with increasing flow through the valve while prosthetic valves showed a markedly weaker increase. Similarly, the native and Ozaki valve showed a similar increase in mPG with forward flow which was weaker than prosthetic valves. Cusp kinematics were similar between the native and Ozaki valve, whilst prosthetic valves were clearly distinguishable from them.CONCLUSIONSThe Ozaki procedure showed excellent hydrodynamic performance compared to prosthetic valves and showed similar cusp motion characteristics to the native aortic valve. Our results suggest that the Ozaki neocuspidized valve behaves physiologically in many aspects, which may contribute to beneficial clinical outcomes.