Ex vivo comparison of hand‐sutured versus circular stapled anastomosis in canine large intestine

Abstract

To compare leakage pressures of colonic anastomoses performed with circular staplers to conventional hand-sewn techniques in dogs. Ex-vivo study. Colon from 11 canine cadavers. Thirty-two colonic anastomoses were performed. Four segments from each colon were randomly assigned to one of four techniques: hand-sewn colonic anastomoses performed with 4-0 glycomer 631 (G) and 4-0 barbed glycomer 631 (BG), and circular stapled colonic anastomoses using 4.8 mm End-to-End Anastomosis (EEA C4.8mm) and 3.5 mm End-to-End Anastomosis (EEA C3.5mm), 21 mm diameter circular staples in cadaveric canine colon. Leakage pressure was defined as the pressure at which dye-containing solution was first observed to leak from the anastomosis site. Leakage pressures were 49.5 mmHg (range:16-72) in group G, 45.5 mmHg (range:19-80) in group BG, 5.3 mmHg (range:0-31) in group C3.5mm, and 29.5 mmHg (range:23-50.3) in group C4.8mm. Anastomoses leaked at lower pressures when stapled rather than hand-sewn (C4.8mm-G p=.0313, C4.8mm-BG p=.0131, C3.5mm-G p=.0469, C3.5mm-BG p=.0313). Two of the C3.5mm constructs leaked immediately after saline infusion with 4/6 leaking at <5.3 mmHg. End-to-end colonic anastomoses closed with circular stapler leaked at lower pressures than hand-sutured anastomoses. Use of the EEA stapler with a staple height of 3.5 mm did not result in safe colonic anastomoses. These results provide evidence to support hand-suturing colonic anatomoses with G and BG in dogs. The 4.8 mm staples may be considered in anatomical locations difficult to reach.