Abstract
Postmodernism’s conceptual orientation and dissolution of boundaries might First Amendment law’s broadly inclusive marketplace of ideas, but instead art and law speak past one another. The result of Jackson Pollock as the exemplar of constitutionally covered visual art is not simply a matter of over- or underinclusion, but a doctrine and discourse that is reductive, anachronistic, and culturally alienated.2
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
