Abstract
The most provocative and crucial argument of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action is the claim that the parties participating in communicative action can reach an understanding and agreement in any case if they aim to reach an agreement, not to dominate/oppress or manipulate each other. This claim, which is at the core of his social theory as a whole, requires an analysis of the conditions for reaching an agreement in communicative action. In this regard, Habermas provides the most detailed analysis of these conditions from the linguistic perspective in his article: “What Is Universal Pragmatics?” This article discusses Habermas’ linguistic justification for the Theory of Communicative Action through an elaborative reading of “What Is Universal Pragmatics?”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
