Abstract
The advent of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), generally viewed as a safe and effective intervention, has in some measure discouraged the use of electrophysiologically directed endocardial resection for intractable ventricular arrhythmias. We reviewed the records of 127 patients undergoing either AICD procedures or resection over a 6-year period. Thirty-day mortality was 5.6% ( 5 / 89 patients) for all AICD procedures, 10.7% ( 3 / 28 ) for AICD placement plus coronary artery bypass grafting, and 11.8% ( 4 / 34 ) for resection. These mortality figures are not significantly different. Patients undergoing resection were less likely to require antiarrhythmic agents than patients given an AICD (33% versus 61%). Survival at 2 years was 78% in the resection group and 72% in the AICD group. Survival at 4 years was still 78% in the resection group. Only 1 late sudden death occurred in the AICD group and none in the resection group. We conclude that resection continues to be a valuable alternative, offering a greater overall benefit at only slightly increased risk.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
