Abstract

Mesoamerica is considered a biodiversity hot spot with levels of endemism and species diversity likely underestimated. Unfortunately, the region continues to experience some of the highest deforestation rates in the world. For mammals, the evolutionary relationships of many endemic taxa are controversial, as it is the case for members of the genus Handleyomys. Estimation of a time-calibrated hypothesis for the evolution of these six genera (Euryoryzomys, Handleyomys, Hylaeamys, Nephelomys, Oecomys and Transandinomys) supported a monophyletic Handleyomys sensu lato. Based on their distinctive morphology and the amount of inter-generic genetic divergence, Handleyomys sensu stricto, H. alfaroi, the H. chapmani, and the H. melanotis species groups warrant recognition as separate genera. In addition, species delimitation documents the existence of cryptic species-level lineages within H. alfaroi and H. rostratus. Cryptic lineages within H. rostratus exhibited significant niche differentiation, but this was not the pattern among species-level clades within H. alfaroi. Similarly, age–range correlations revealed that niche evolution within Handleyomys is not correlated with evolutionary time, instead, ancestral climate tolerance reconstructions show niche disparities at specific diversification events within the chapmani and melanotis species groups, while the climatic niche of the rest of species of Handleyomys tended to be conservative.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.