Abstract

Can orthologous proteins differ in terms of their ability to be secreted? To answer this question, we investigated the distribution of signal peptides within the orthologous groups of Enterobacterales. Parsimony analysis and sequence comparisons revealed a large number of signal peptide gain and loss events, in which signal peptides emerge or disappear in the course of evolution. Signal peptide losses prevail over gains, an effect which is especially pronounced in the transition from the free-living or commensal to the endosymbiotic lifestyle. The disproportionate decline in the number of signal peptide-containing proteins in endosymbionts cannot be explained by the overall reduction of their genomes. Signal peptides can be gained and lost either by acquisition/elimination of the corresponding N-terminal regions or by gradual accumulation of mutations. The evolutionary dynamics of signal peptides in bacterial proteins represents a powerful mechanism of functional diversification.

Highlights

  • Protein function is not set in stone—it can undergo both gradual and drastic changes due to a variety of evolutionary events, including mutations, insertions, deletions, and duplications

  • Computational prediction of signal peptides is an indispensable step in bacterial genome annotation, but their evolutionary dynamics has not been comprehensively studied

  • We investigated the gain and loss patterns of signal peptides between orthologous proteins from Enterobacterales and found that 1.9% of clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) contain proteins both with and without signal peptides

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protein function is not set in stone—it can undergo both gradual and drastic changes due to a variety of evolutionary events, including mutations, insertions, deletions, and duplications. The evolutionary dynamics of enzymatic and binding activities has been extensively studied, functional shifts associated with the evolution of cellular targeting signals have received much less attention, and most of the work done so far focused on the sequence diversity of eukaryotic signal peptides, mitochondrial targeting signals, and chloroplast transit peptides (Williams et al 2000; Doyle et al 2013; Fukasawa et al 2014).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.